Six of TDWI's expert fellows offer up their top 2 strategic insights for what to expect in the upcoming year.
As organizations continue to operationalize AI, modernize data platforms, and respond to mounting regulatory and economic pressures, 2026 represents a pivotal year for data and analytics leaders. Experimentation is giving way to execution, and new practices are becoming strategic imperatives.
Below, we've asked six TDWI experts to share their unique predictions on the technologies, practices, and organizational shifts that will shape enterprise data, analytics, and AI over the coming year. These perspectives are grounded in TDWI research, real-world client engagements, and deep experience working with organizations navigating rapid change.
Fern Halper
TDWI VP of Research
Prediction 1: Agentic AI Matures
2026 will mark the point where agentic AI starts to move from experimentation to practical deployment. The signals are strong: in 2025, vendors entered the market with agent frameworks and orchestration tools, and 36% of organizations were already experimenting, with 23% implementing at least single-agent systems in TDWI research. Meanwhile, 67% reported exploring agentic AI for innovation—obvious momentum indicating an inflection point. Enterprises are also redesigning workflows for multi-agent coordination, and standards like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) are emerging as differentiators. There will be many failures and false starts, but agents will be moving forward.
Prediction 2: Data Foundations and AI Governance Become Non-Negotiable
The second major shift in 2026 will be the convergence of enterprise data modernization with serious AI governance. Companies increasingly realize that advanced AI, especially agentic systems, cannot function without reliable, governed, multimodal data. We already see the signs: rising investment in lakehouses, mainstreaming of text data, and growing use of images and video. Early GenAI use cases (e.g., call-center summarization) have validated the value of unstructured data, pushing organizations to treat it as a first-class asset.
Simultaneously, governance pressures are escalating. Forty percent of organizations in TDWI surveys report increased urgency around AI governance, driven by regulatory forces ranging from the EU AI Act to Italy's new AI law, which includes criminal penalties. Agents further amplify the need for lineage, access controls, and auditable decision pathways. Companies are beginning to view governance not as a constraint but as the only viable path to trusted, scalable AI. In 2026, foundation and governance become inseparable. - F.H.
Cal Al-Dhubaib
TDWI Fellow
Prediction 1: The Economics of LLMs Will be Reconciled with Market Realities
Companies will start treating AI programs the same way they treat other major capital decisions. They take a harder look at total cost of ownership, including maintenance, integration, and the human oversight required to achieve reliable outcomes. Build-versus-buy decisions become more disciplined, and teams narrow their focus to use cases with clear, measurable impact. The expectation moves from experimenting with whatever is newest to choosing sustainable, proven approaches. In many cases, simpler automation and human-led processes remain the better option.
Prediction 2: Enterprises Will Shift the Conversation from Task Automation to Workflow Augmentation
Companies recognize that meaningful ROI comes from pairing people with AI across an entire workflow, not automating individual tasks in isolation. This pushes teams to focus on interaction design, exception handling, and the practical skills employees need to use AI effectively. AI takes on the repeatable steps while humans concentrate on judgment, escalation, and decision quality. The work left to people becomes more complex and more valuable, and a larger determinant of overall performance. - C.A.D.
James Kobielus
TDWI Fellow
Prediction 1: Agentic Applications will Drive the Evolution of Enterprise Data Platforms
Databases will evolve to support greater scale, performance, predictability, and manageability of agentic AI applications. The emerging agentic data fabric will drive complex workflows whose underlying logic incorporates machine learning, large language models, fixed business rules, and dynamic contextual variables. Key database platforms in this new order will include those that operate autonomously, provide serverless functions, and enable zero-copy forking of data sets for dynamic agents. In 2026, any enterprise database management system that fails to add value or play well in an agent-centric world will soon become a legacy system, irrelevant and outmoded.
Prediction 2: Context Governance Will Become a Key Enterprise Focus in Agentic AI
To ensure more trustworthy agentic applications, enterprises will retool their governance practices to ensure that only the highest quality, most relevant, and most current metadata fills AI systems' context windows within tightly orchestrated workflows. Growing threats that enterprise AI professionals will need to mitigate include context poisoning (the risk that hallucinations will be incorporated into the context window that is referenced by agents), context distraction (the risk that older context in the window might be overlearned by agents to the exclusion of learnings from fresh training), and context clash (the risk of conflicts between new and old context in the window). In 2026, poor governance of contextual metadata will become as large a showstopper in enterprise agentic AI practices as inadequate governance of training data. - J.K.
Deanne Larson
TDWI Fellow
Prediction 1: Data Readiness Will Be the Main Bottleneck and the Most Critical Area for Investment in Enterprise AI
In 2026, organizations will realize that the absolute limit on AI value is no longer model sophistication but data readiness. As companies accelerate the adoption of agentic and multimodal AI systems, leaders will recognize that fragmented ownership, undocumented pipelines, inconsistent semantics, and unclear lineage hinder innovation. AI programs will start shifting their budgets from experimentation to foundational capabilities: governed data products, standardized metadata practices, contractual data quality standards, and operational data life cycle management. Success will come not from companies with the most advanced models, but from those with clean, connected, well-governed data ecosystems that enable AI to function reliably at scale.
Prediction 2: AI Literacy Transitions from a Specialist Skill Set to a Core Organizational Competency
By 2026, enterprises will realize that sustainable AI adoption requires more than just technical teams building models. It requires the broader workforce to understand how to use, oversee, and challenge AI systems. Organizations will move past basic "AI awareness" training and adopt structured, role-specific AI literacy programs focused on decision quality, escalation procedures, bias detection, prompt engineering, and responsible use standards. Employees will be evaluated not only on their ability to operate AI tools but also on their ability to validate outputs, handle ambiguity, and integrate AI into complex workflows. Companies that invest early in workforce-wide AI skills will experience faster adoption, lower operational risk, and much higher ROI as teams learn to co-create value with AI rather than merely consume automated outputs. -D.L.
Prashanth Southekal
TDWI Fellow
Prediction 1: Headless Architectures Will Become the Foundation of Digital Systems
The digital landscape today is rapidly shifting towards more flexible, scalable, and user-centric systems. This is driving organizations away from traditional monolithic architectures (where front-end and back-end were tightly coupled) to a "headless architecture" where the user interface is decoupled from the underlying databases and content systems. Given the increasing reliance on AI applications which depend on data and content, headless architectures will be explored by more enterprises across industries and functions in the coming days.
To implement headless architecture, organizations should focus on three key priorities:
1. Adopt an API-First Approach: Build back-end systems with robust APIs at the core to enable seamless integration across diverse front-end channels. APIs provide the flexibility to deliver data and content seamlessly across various platforms and devices, thereby ensuring access.
2. Shift to Microservices: Replace monolithic systems with modular microservices that can scale independently. This enhances resilience, accelerates innovation, and allows teams to update or deploy components efficiently.
3. Prioritize Omnichannel Experience: Use headless architecture to deliver personalized, consistent UX/UI experiences across all touchpoints. Companies should leverage the flexibility of headless systems to tailor content dynamically, optimize for different screen sizes across various devices, and integrate personalized recommendations.
Organizations that leverage headless architecture can build digital ecosystems that are flexible, scalable, and ready for the future.
Prediction 2: Data Observability Will Shape AI Governance
Data observability is the organization's ability to understand the health, quality, and behavior of its data through continuous monitoring of data pipelines. As AI becomes increasingly embedded in improving business processes and optimizing business outcomes, maintaining data quality with effective data observability capabilities is a foundational enabler of trustworthy AI.
To implement data observability for reliable AI solutions, organizations should focus on three priorities:
1. Embed Data Observability into the AI Governance Operating Model: Treat data observability as a governance function incorporated throughout the life cycle of AI solutions. Define clear thresholds for acceptable data quality levels and ensure that observability outputs automatically trigger governance actions, such as model review, rollback, or even human validation.
2. Establish Data Contracts for Unified Data Management: Create data contracts between IT, data, and analytics/AI teams, ensuring that data is visible, tested, and assessed for business impact. Data contracts bring accountability and transparency to strengthen governance decisions, accelerate incident resolution, and reduce AI model risk.
3. Operationalize AI Risk Management: Implement continuous observability across production data pipelines, with alerts configured for anomalies that influence model accuracy, fairness, or stability. Train teams to respond rapidly, ensuring AI systems remain compliant, reliable, and aligned with business goals and purpose.
By adopting effective data observability, organizations can detect data drift, monitor lineage for compliance, validate training data sets, and detect system-level risks, making it central to proactive, dynamic AI governance. -P.S.
David Stodder
TDWI Fellow
Prediction 1: AI Accelerates the Reinvention of BI, Disrupting Traditional Practices and Demanding Modern Platforms
AI is driving new data demands, which means organizations must modernize the business intelligence (BI) tools, business analytics applications, and platforms set up to serve traditional data requirements. Multimodal AI requires easier and more continuous access to multimodal data, which is pushing enterprises to unify underlying data warehouse and data lake tiers as well as use data fabrics for integrating access to and governance of distributed data resources.
AI augmentation of BI has been a dominant technology trend, but the pace is picking up. TDWI research shows strong interest in AI-driven automation of all tasks in data journeys critical to BI and analytics. Modern BI and analytics platforms offer generative and agentic AI capabilities. In a recent TDWI survey, 62% of respondents said they are using commercial generative BI products; in another survey, 25% said they will build their own generative BI front ends.
AI agents in BI and analytics platforms are evolving from chatbots and simple assistants to more autonomous agents that can take command of entire data processes. As more agents are deployed, modern BI and analytics platforms must be able to orchestrate complex agent execution and collaboration. Systems will use AI to learn from user behavior and workflow requirements to personalize data delivery and visualizations for contextual, actionable insights. BI and analytics applications and platforms must enable smooth adoption of prebuilt and reusable AI models to add intelligent capabilities to domain-specific processes in finance, marketing, and other operations.
This expanding AI augmentation of BI and business analytics raises concerns about costs. To bend cost curves down, modern tools, applications, and platforms will increasingly use internal, self-healing agentic AI capabilities to increase efficiency and troubleshoot and remedy problems.
Prediction 2: Semantic Layers Will Advance for Bridging Disparate Users, AI applications, and Systems To Ensure Complete, Quality Data
Demand is growing for easier discovery of and access to complete (often multimodal) data, including accurate information about how data is defined, its quality, data relationships, business context, and other important attributes. This information is critical to efficiency and avoiding confusion for BI users, search engines, analytics, and AI applications. The spotlight should shine in the coming year on advances in often-overlooked semantic layers and related systems for data intelligence, such as data catalogs, master data management systems, and knowledge graphs.
Semantic layers offer an abstraction layer that can bridge shared definitions for data, tables, metrics, calculated fields, dimensions, aggregations, and more. Semantic layers help shield users from technical complexity and improve consistency. However, just as multiple data catalogs and applications can have conflicting metadata, different semantic layers may not match up. Conflicts and gaps in semantic layers and models can thwart AI model development and lead to erroneous answers in applications augmented by generative and agentic AI.
These problems are increasing interest in establishing an open, location-independent, unified, and AI-augmented layer that can bridge multiple semantic layers and work across data warehouse and data lake tiers. Data fabrics in distributed systems rely on unified semantic layers that provide a single point of federated access, search, and governance, including to track data lineage. Application programming interfaces (APIs) can be published to enable semantic layer access and expansion and to enrich data exchange.
Modern semantic layers may incorporate an ontology to include definitions and information about data relationships between business entities, people, and other objects of interest. Some semantic layers are enabling natural language functionality for easier user search and discovery of relevant information in the layer and in other data intelligence systems. Advances in these and other types of functionalities should make 2026 an important year in the evolution of semantic layers and data intelligence. - D.S.
Looking Ahead...
The predictions outlined here point to a common theme: in 2026, success with data, analytics, and AI will depend less on novelty and more on discipline. Strong foundations, effective governance, economic realism, and workforce readiness will separate organizations that scale AI responsibly from those that struggle to move beyond experimentation.
As these forces converge, data and AI leaders must act decisively—investing in the capabilities, architectures, and skills that enable AI to deliver sustained business value. TDWI will continue to track these shifts and support organizations as they navigate the next phase of data and AI maturity.
0 comments
According to new research from TDWI, AI has moved from the experimental to everyday workflow, but governance and user guardrails lag behind.
Three highlights from the report, called "The Impact of Generative AI on Business," include:
1) AI Adoption Is Near-Ubiquitous
Nine in ten organizations report using general-purpose AI assistants for writing, coding, research, and brainstorming, while a majority say they use them daily.
2) Builders Are Going Beyond “Out-of-the-Box”
The study distinguishes “consumers” of packaged tools from “builders” aligning AI to company data and processes. Builders report active work on document summarization, externally facing chatbots, knowledge search/RAG, workflow automation, and custom employee copilots.
3) Governance Is the Weak Link
The most-cited frustration is lack of governance, followed by AI literacy gaps, hallucinations, and shaky data foundations. Without clear policies, controls, and training, the risk profile grows even as usage expands.
In short, AI is already embedded in day-to-day work. The differentiator now isn’t access to tools, it's disciplined oversight and smart alignment to proprietary data and real workflows.
Get more details on the highlights above and read the full report here.
0 comments
Here are five items you don’t want to miss this week, including a survey showing enterprises racing into AI without readiness, draft U.S. model-security rules poised to reshape AI governance, and new research on the real business impact of generative AI.
NIST Issues Draft Cybersecurity Guidance for AI
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology recently released draft cybersecurity guidelines tailored for AI systems. The proposal extends its AI Risk Management Framework with expectations around model provenance, data integrity, logging, and incident response, signaling more prescriptive oversight for AI deployment and governance. NIST
Enterprise AI Usage Widely Adopted, But Scaling Lags
According to a global survey reported on by PureAI.com, 71 percent of businesses are piloting or already using AI, yet only 30 percent feel ready to scale initiatives across the enterprise. Key barriers include shortages in AI talent, unpredictable LLM costs, and persistent privacy and compliance worries. Organizations say they plan to invest in talent, data quality, security, and infrastructure, but readiness still trails adoption. PureAI
Data Readiness as a Trust Issue
An analysis in Intelligent CIO North America argues that inconsistent, unstructured, or poorly governed data undermines AI trust, even in straightforward use cases such as contract retrieval. The piece emphasizes structured, enriched, accessible, and well-governed data as prerequisites for dependable outcomes. Intelligent CIO North America
Enterprise AI Adoption Rises While Governance Lags
TechRadar Pro reports that one in four enterprise applications now features AI, but many organizations lack core governance practices. With limited use of AI firewalls and continuous data labeling, compliance and reliability risks remain as adoption expands. TechRadar Pro
The Impact of Generative AI on Business
A new TDWI research brief examines how generative AI is reshaping organizations, highlighting both measurable value and persistent risks. Findings point to productivity gains and expanding use cases alongside governance gaps and uneven maturity, reinforcing that readiness is the differentiator between hype and sustainable impact. TDWI Research Brief
0 comments
Here are five podcast episodes that dig into what it takes to be AI-ready: From data foundations and governance to enterprise adoption and skills. (All podcasts available through the major distributors unless otherwise indicated.)
TDWI Speaking of Data — Episode 65: AI Readiness with Fern Halper
TDWI’s Fern Halper breaks down organizational focus areas and the TDWI AI Readiness Assessment, covering data, operations, skills, and governance as practical levers for getting from pilot to production. Listen
DataFramed — Episode 281: Developing AI Products That Impact Your Business
Richie Cotton and Venky Veeraraghavan discuss aligning AI with business processes, build-vs-buy choices, and the roles and skills needed to operationalize AI—useful for teams formalizing an AI roadmap. Listen
HBR IdeaCast — Episode 987: The AI Skills You Should Be Building Now
Accenture leaders outline the core skills and workflows managers need to make generative AI productive and safe, highlighting readiness gaps that derail adoption. Listen
KPMG “You Can with AI” — Episode 2: Data Readiness: The Backbone of AI Success
A concise primer on preparing data for AI at scale—covering collection, cleansing, governance, and platform choices—aimed at leaders building an execution plan. Listen
a16z Podcast — Episode 887: Aaron Levie on AI’s Enterprise Adoption
Box CEO Aaron Levie and a16z’s Martin Casado talk through real-world adoption patterns, from workflow changes to incumbent advantages—helpful context for readiness planning beyond proofs of concept. Listen
0 comments
Model audits are important, but without data governance, AI risk is already baked in. TDWI explains why effective AI governance must begin with the data that powers your systems.
When people talk about AI governance, they usually talk about models—how to audit them, how to explain them, how to control them. But here’s the reality: by the time you get to the model, the risk is already baked in. If your data isn’t governed, the rest doesn’t matter.
True AI governance starts with data. What you collect, how it’s prepared, who has access, what’s missing, what’s biased—all of it shapes how your AI behaves long before a single line of model code is written.
Model Governance Gets the Headlines
Explainability. Audits. Decision traceability. These are all vital topics, and yes, your models need guardrails. But focusing exclusively on the model is like trying to control a wildfire by adjusting the wind. You’re intervening too late in the process to have real control.
Most governance frameworks—especially in regulated industries—still lag behind AI’s complexity. And yet, many companies are building their governance playbooks from the model up, instead of from the data forward. That’s a mistake.
Why Data Is the Real Root of Risk
Data is where AI gets its intelligence. If the data is skewed, incomplete, mislabeled, duplicated, or poorly sourced, the model inherits that bias or fragility—regardless of how well it’s engineered. Even black-box models follow the patterns they’ve been fed.
And it’s not just quality. Governance gaps in data access, usage tracking, retention, and compliance create legal and reputational risks that can’t be patched after deployment.
- Labeling issues: Incorrectly or inconsistently labeled data can lead to discriminatory or dangerous model behavior.
- Data lineage gaps: Without traceability, you can’t explain where a prediction came from—or who’s responsible.
- Compliance exposure: If your training data includes sensitive or regulated information, and no one knows, you’re already out of compliance.
- Bias blind spots: Historical data often reflects historical bias. Governance is what helps teams recognize and address that before it becomes institutionalized in a model.
The Fallacy of “Fix It Later”
Too many teams assume they can tune the model to fix upstream issues. But no amount of algorithmic fine-tuning can correct for broken or ungoverned data inputs. At best, it adds layers of complexity. At worst, it hides problems behind a layer of mathematical opacity.
Without governed data, you’re flying blind. You don’t know what the model learned—or why.
What AI-Ready Data Governance Looks Like
AI-ready governance isn’t just traditional data governance rebranded. It’s governance adapted to the needs of systems that learn, adapt, and operate at scale. It requires a shift in what’s tracked, documented, and enforced.
- Purpose tagging: Know which data sets are being used for what AI task—classification, forecasting, training, fine-tuning, etc.
- Access control by use case: A data set used for model training may need different permissions than one used for dashboards.
- Versioning and auditability: You must be able to trace every version of a data set used in model development—down to specific rows if needed.
- Retention and reproducibility: For compliance, reproducibility, and retraining, you must retain not just the model, but the exact data snapshot that created it.
- Bias auditing and fairness testing: These must start at the data level—not just on model outputs.
Who Owns AI Data Governance?
AI governance requires cross-functional ownership. Data engineers, governance teams, ML teams, and compliance/legal stakeholders must work from a shared understanding. That means creating policies not just for the data warehouse, but for the data in motion that flows into and across AI systems.
One common misstep is assuming that governance ends at storage. In AI pipelines, the real risk often begins at transformation. Monitoring how data is reshaped, filtered, labeled, and joined is just as important as knowing where it lives.
Getting Ahead of Regulation
AI regulations are coming—fast. From the EU AI Act to FTC guidance in the U.S., regulatory bodies are increasingly demanding explainability, fairness, and traceability. None of that is possible if you can’t describe what data went into your models or how it was handled.
Waiting until those questions are asked is too late. AI governance is a data story first—and organizations that don’t treat it that way will find themselves exposed when the audits begin.
The Bottom Line
AI governance doesn’t begin with explainable models. It begins with explainable data. Without data governance at the foundation, every model is a potential liability—no matter how accurate it appears on paper.
0 comments
From poor data quality to missing context, many AI challenges stem from unprepared data. Learn how AI-ready data can address the top five causes of AI project obstacles.
Many AI projects encounter challenges not because of the models—but because of the data. Without the right structure, labeling, and controls, AI systems can produce variable or unusable results.
1. The Data Looks Clean, but It's Not AI-Ready
Data may appear "clean" if it works in dashboards and reports. But AI often needs more: labeled data, raw inputs, and metadata that provides context. What's clean for reporting isn't always sufficient for machine learning.
2. The Model Works in Testing Then Breaks in Production
Inconsistent data formats, real-world noise, and lack of monitoring in data pipelines can lead to model degradation. AI-ready data pipelines include checks, versioning, and feedback loops to help prevent this.
3. The System Produces Unexpected Results or Poor Recommendations
This often comes down to gaps in the input data or unstructured content without context. Training data should be complete, consistent, and aligned with how the model will be used in real workflows.
4. Compliance and Privacy Gaps Create Risk
Data that's not properly governed or masked before use in AI models can lead to exposure of sensitive information. AI-ready data includes metadata, access control, and masking strategies.
5. You're Chasing Models Without Fixing the Foundation
Teams invest in fine-tuning models or buying new tools, but may neglect the data backbone. AI readiness often starts with better data preparation, not just bigger models.
How to Turn It Around
- Identify where existing data needs enhancement for AI use cases
- Build or update data pipelines to handle raw, labeled, and high-granularity inputs
- Establish a clear governance layer: ownership, access control, compliance guardrails
- Partner across teams: data engineering, ML, compliance, and business stakeholders
The Bottom Line
If your AI projects keep encountering obstacles or producing variable outcomes, the issue may be upstream. Getting your data truly AI-ready isn't just a technical fix—it's often the difference between experimentation and scalable success.
0 comments
It may seem that BI-ready data is enough for AI. Learn what else AI needs from your data in order to succeed.
BI-ready data is typically aggregated, structured for human interpretation, and optimized for visualization and reporting. It's clean, consistent, and governed—representing significant organizational investment in data quality, integration, and discipline. AI-ready data builds on this foundation but often requires additional elements: greater granularity, labeled training examples, contextual metadata, and real-time accessibility.
Key Considerations for AI
- Purpose: BI data supports human decision-making through dashboards and reports. AI applications may need the same data structured for algorithmic processing and automated decision-making.
- Granularity: While BI often works with aggregated data, AI models frequently need access to raw, detailed records with timestamps and sequence information preserved.
- Labeling: BI rarely requires labeled data sets, but supervised learning models depend on properly labeled training examples to learn patterns.
- Structure: BI systems can handle some data inconsistencies that humans can interpret in context. AI systems require more rigid structural consistency.
- Latency: BI typically operates on batch-processed data, while some AI applications require real-time or streaming data access.
Why This Distinction Matters
Organizations with strong BI foundations have a significant advantage in AI readiness. They've already established data governance, quality processes, and integration discipline—the hardest parts of data preparation. However, assuming BI-ready data is automatically AI-ready can create gaps in model performance and reliability.
The risk isn't that BI preparation is inadequate, but rather that additional AI-specific requirements might be overlooked, leading to models that can't reach their full potential.
Building on BI Success
- Assess your foundation: Audit existing BI pipelines to identify what's already AI-suitable and what needs enhancement.
- Extend, don't rebuild: Add AI-specific elements like labels, increased granularity, and real-time access while leveraging existing data quality and governance.
- Create complementary workflows: Develop AI-specific data preparation processes that build on your BI infrastructure rather than replacing it.
- Involve the right teams: Bring ML engineering into conversations with your established BI and data engineering teams to identify synergies and gaps.
The Takeaway
Organizations with mature BI practices are well-positioned for AI success. The discipline of integration, quality, and governance that makes BI effective provides the essential foundation for AI applications. The key is recognizing what additional elements AI requires and building on your existing strengths rather than starting from scratch.
Strong BI readiness doesn't complete the AI journey, but it significantly shortens the path by establishing the data infrastructure, quality processes, and organizational discipline that successful AI initiatives require.
0 comments
Many teams assume their existing data is ready for AI, but even well-managed data often needs additional preparation to power successful machine learning initiatives.
As organizations race to implement artificial intelligence, one term keeps popping up: AI-ready data. It's more than a buzzword: It's the foundation for building successful, scalable, and responsible AI systems. But what exactly does it mean? And more importantly, how do you know if your data is AI-ready?
What Is AI-Ready Data?
AI-ready data refers to data sets that are clean, consistent, complete, and formatted in ways that machine learning (ML) and AI systems can interpret and use effectively. It's data that's been curated with AI use cases in mind—whether for predictive models, generative AI, or intelligent automation.
Unlike data prepared for traditional BI dashboards and enterprise reporting, AI-ready data often requires deeper context, higher granularity, and more rigorous quality controls. It must also be accessible and governed appropriately to ensure ethical and secure use.
Why AI-Ready Data Matters
- Better model performance: Clean, labeled, well-structured data helps reduce hallucinations, bias, and error.
- Faster time to insight: AI-ready pipelines reduce rework and help you deploy models more quickly.
- Reduced risk: Proper governance of AI data helps meet compliance and ethical standards.
- Scalability: AI-ready data isn't just for one model—it's reusable, adaptable, and future-proofed.
Key Characteristics of AI-Ready Data
- Structured and/or properly labeled unstructured data
- High data quality (completeness, accuracy, consistency)
- Clear metadata and lineage
- Accessible through secure, governed pipelines
- Context-rich (e.g., timestamps, user behavior, source systems)
Building on Your BI Foundation
If your organization has invested in BI-ready data infrastructure, you're already ahead of the game. BI initiatives establish crucial foundations that accelerate your path to AI readiness:
- Data integration discipline: BI projects teach organizations how to consolidate data from multiple sources systematically.
- Quality processes: The data cleansing and validation work done for BI creates a solid baseline for AI initiatives.
- Governance frameworks: Access controls, compliance processes, and data stewardship practices developed for BI scale naturally to AI use cases.
- Organizational alignment: Cross-functional collaboration around data definitions and business rules translates directly to AI projects.
From BI-Ready to AI-Ready: What's Different?
While BI-ready data provides an excellent foundation, AI applications typically require additional considerations:
- Granularity: BI often uses aggregated, summarized data for reporting, while AI models often need more granular, individual-level data to identify patterns and make predictions.
- Real-time capabilities: Many AI use cases require streaming or near-real-time data, whereas BI reports can often work with batch-processed data.
- Feature engineering: AI models benefit from derived features and contextual variables that may not be necessary for standard BI reporting.
- Labeling requirements: Supervised learning models need labeled training data, which is rarely required for BI dashboards.
- Volume and variety: AI initiatives often incorporate unstructured data types (text, images, audio) alongside traditional structured data.
Why the Enhanced Requirements Matter
Organizations with strong BI foundations can leverage their existing data management capabilities while addressing these additional AI requirements. The key is recognizing that AI-ready data builds upon—rather than replaces—good BI practices.
Without this enhanced preparation, AI projects face increased risks of missing context, model drift, and unpredictable behavior. However, organizations that have mastered data integration, quality, and governance for BI are well-positioned to tackle these AI-specific challenges.
First Steps to Evolve Your Data for AI
- Audit your current BI infrastructure to identify existing strengths in data quality, governance, and integration
- Define specific AI use cases to guide additional data preparation requirements
- Work with cross-functional teams to extend existing data definitions and governance frameworks
- Invest in enhanced capabilities like real-time pipelines, data labeling, and feature stores
- Explore AI-specific tools that integrate with your existing data architecture—from data lakes to MLOps platforms
0 comments